By Allison Lampert and David Shepardson

(Reuters) – The union representing 1000’s of hanging Boeing (NYSE:) U.S. manufacturing unit staff mentioned late on Tuesday a survey confirmed members have been overwhelmingly towards the planemaker’s newest pay proposal, which it described as its “greatest and remaining”.

Earlier within the day, Boeing mentioned it could lengthen the timeline for a vote on a brand new contract after the union had rejected the corporate’s preliminary Friday deadline.

Greater than 32,000 Boeing staff within the Seattle space and Portland, Oregon, walked off the job on Sept. 13 within the union’s first strike since 2008, halting manufacturing of airplane fashions together with its best-selling 737 MAX.

Almost 95% rejected Boeing’s supply of a 25% pay rise over 4 years, resulting in the strike. An improved proposal introduced by Boeing on Monday would carry the pay achieve to 30% and restore a efficiency bonus, however the union mentioned a survey of its members discovered that was not sufficient.

“The survey outcomes from yesterday have been overwhelmingly clear, nearly as loud as the primary supply: members are usually not within the firm’s newest supply,” Worldwide Affiliation of Machinists and Aerospace Staff District 751 mentioned on Tuesday.

The union has been in search of a 40% pay rise and the restoration of a defined-benefit pension that was taken away within the contract a decade in the past.

Boeing, which didn’t instantly remark, put ahead the newest supply on Monday with out negotiating with the union on it beforehand. The union declined to place it to an instantaneous vote, saying it could survey its members earlier than deciding.

“We heard you, and you’ve got informed us loud and clear that this proposal didn’t go far sufficient to handle our members’ priorities,” the union mentioned on Tuesday. “We’ve got made it clear that we’re able to schedule mediated or direct talks with Boeing as the trail to discover a decision to this strike.”

BACKTRACKING

Labor specialists mentioned Boeing supply to maneuver the deadline for a vote was the newest case of backtracking, which may undermine the planemaker’s credibility.

Earlier than the strike, Boeing’s industrial planes chief Stephanie Pope informed staff that its proposal at the moment was the most effective deal they’d get, but on Monday it made an improved “greatest and remaining” supply.

“It is not an excellent factor for Boeing to say that is our remaining supply after which pretty shortly reverse,” mentioned Harry Katz, a professor of collective bargaining at Cornell College’s College of Industrial and Labor Relations.

Hanging staff are set to overlook their first paychecks on Thursday.

Katz mentioned staff feeling the pinch of lacking wages ought to think about Boeing’s newest supply, which he known as strong.

The strike is the newest occasion in a tumultuous yr for Boeing that started with a January incident during which a door panel indifferent from a brand new 737 MAX jet mid-air.

Throughout the strike, Boeing has frozen hiring and began furloughs for 1000’s of U.S. staff to scale back prices. Boeing has deliberate for non-union staff to take one week of furlough each 4 weeks on a rolling foundation in the course of the strike.

In response to financial information analytics agency IMPLAN, if Boeing’s strike continues by means of Sept. 27, it could cut back U.S. gross home product by $1 billion, and result in $500 million in misplaced labor revenue.

Some employees are refusing to “disagree and commit,” as one of many firm’s famed management ideas requires of those that aren’t on board with a call.

As an alternative, lots of of the web retailing big’s staff are complaining that CEO Andy Jassy’s five-days-per-week return-to-office mandate, introduced final week, will negatively affect their lives—and productiveness at work—and the way they hope the corporate will reverse course.

The suggestions is from an nameless survey created by Amazon staff that was seen by Fortune on Tuesday. Company staff have shared it broadly through the messaging app Slack, together with in a single “distant advocacy” Slack channel with greater than 30,000 members {that a} former worker created when Amazon first introduced a three-day return-to-office mandate final 12 months.

Consequently, staff who’re in favor of distant or hybrid work might have been extra possible to answer the survey and subsequently skew the findings.

As of the afternoon of September 24, the common satisfaction ranking associated to the RTO mandate amongst survey respondents was 1.4 out of scale as much as 5 (with 1 which means “strongly dissatisfied” and 5 representing “strongly happy”). The survey’s creators stated in an introduction to their questionnaire that they plan to mixture and share the outcomes by e-mail with Jassy and different firm executives “to supply them with clear perception into the affect of this coverage on staff, together with the challenges recognized and proposed options.”

“We’re in search of sincere, constructive suggestions on the latest choice to require a 5-day return to the workplace schedule,” the survey introduction reads.

An Amazon spokesperson declined to remark.

Amazon has used a hybrid work construction for the previous 15 months earlier than Jassy’s latest bombshell announcement that the majority company staff can be required to work a full five-day work week from their native Amazon workplace beginning in January.

“After we look again over the past 5 years, we proceed to imagine that some great benefits of being collectively within the workplace are important,”  final week. “I’ve beforehand defined these advantages, however in abstract, we’ve noticed that it’s simpler for our teammates to be taught, mannequin, apply, and strengthen our tradition; collaborating, brainstorming, and inventing are less complicated and simpler; instructing and studying from each other are extra seamless; and, groups are typically higher linked to 1 one other.”

Jassy clarification concerning the new mandate, and a second one asserting a deliberate thinning of center administration, got here throughout as inside Amazon lately, .

Fortune has talked to and messaged with a number of dozen Amazon company staff since final week’s announcement, with most opposing Jassy’s choice for causes together with diminished productiveness throughout in-office work days and management’s lack of belief in rank-and-file staff and managers, based mostly on the change in RTO coverage. In addition they complained concerning the affect the coverage could have on single mother and father and a scarcity of information explaining the choice from an organization whose leaders usually discuss up data-backed decision-making.

Some, nevertheless, applauded the transfer in communications with Fortune and argued that utilizing the size or value of commutes as excuses to keep away from 5 days within the workplace weekly would have appeared absurd just some years in the past pre-pandemic.

Nonetheless, most respondents opposed the change or cited issues that the brand new coverage will create.

“I work with folks throughout many time zones,” one response learn. “With RTO, they not have the flexibleness to simply shift hours and collaborate. 3 day had an immediate affect right here, and 5 day will solely be worse.”

As for an answer, the worker prompt “extra real looking work expectations if we’re eliminating WFH.”

“Amazon obtained used to folks having an additional 5-10 hours per week to work as a result of we weren’t commuting,” the worker stated. “RTO implies that we not have the additional time to decide to Amazon and expectations of staff wants to regulate to replicate that. On an identical be aware, we have to settle for that RTO locations onerous limits on assembly instances. I am unable to hop onto an 8am assembly with the parents in HQ2 or the East Coast anymore. After I was at residence, I might bounce on early or late conferences fairly simply, however I am bodily unable to do this now.”

A number of respondents targeted on the belief, or mistrust issue, and the concern, echoed by many staff, that the transfer will drive out prime expertise who can simply discover work elsewhere, whereas different teams with fewer choices stay.

“The folks that depart first are the robust engineers you need to work with,” one wrote. “Others that may’t discover new jobs or cannot depart as a result of visa are depressing and quiet stop. Anybody left that really needs to work has to select up the slack.”

One more, echoing others, stated they imagine that the mandate “ignores the problem of requiring folks to return into an workplace, however all of their work and each assembly is executed over chime or video convention.”

Most of those that selected “happy” or “strongly happy” didn’t depart remarks past their ranking, or left a unfavorable comment that signaled they might have by accident chosen a optimistic ranking.

The unhealthy information for these dissatisfied with the brand new return-to-the-office rule is that when a bunch of Amazon staff despatched a six-page memo to management final 12 months making the case to reverse the unique three-day in-office mandate, it was dismissed. With Jassy and group digging of their RTO heels additional, it is onerous to think about these outcomes producing any important change.

Are you a present or former Amazon worker with ideas on this matter or a tip to share? Contact Jason Del Rey at jason.delrey@fortune.com, jasondelrey@protonmail.com, or by safe messaging app Sign at 917-655-4267. You can even message him  or at  on .

This story was initially featured on